The following is a communique we have sent to staffers of the Republican members of the House Judiciary Committee. The purpose is to make our pro-white case and also in the hope they may use some of our talking points. We also sent all committee members the US law on genocide (18 U.S.C. § 1091 ) and Bob Whitaker’s mantra.
Judiciary Committee press release on hearings: https://judiciary.house.gov/news/press-releases/april-9-house-judiciary-hold-hearing-hate-crimes-white-nationalism
Republican Members of the House Judiciary Committee:
“Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.” ~Harry S Truman
During the upcoming Holy Inquisition of the Religion of Political Correctness to be held April 9, 2019 in the House Judiciary Committee, your white voters will be watching to see whether you advocate or support any action which singles them out for censorship, whether done by you directly or indirectly through social media as a result of federal legislation. If you do, why should any of them vote for you?
Pro-whites have already been convicted without ever having a chance to defend themselves in court. They never invited anyone to testify on behalf of white people. This is just a sentencing hearing. But the anti-whites never made the case as to why pro-white advocacy is uniquely evil.
With that in mind, please consider the following:
Many political positions have violent advocates.
If you outlawed discussion of anything that had been horribly misused historically, anyone who talked about the distribution of income would be in prison.
Stalin used the question of the distribution of income to kill tens of millions, and Mao Tse Tung killed even more. Would it be all right then for a gang of thugs to show up and riot every time someone came to the campus to discuss income redistribution?
On July 7, 2016, in Dallas, Texas, Micah Xavier Johnson murdered five police officers and injured nine others. According to Dallas police chief David Brown, Johnson “stated he wanted to kill white people, especially white officers.” In an interview with Wolf Blitzer July 8, 2016, Hillary Clinton said “I’m going to be talking to white people. I think we’re the ones who have to start listening to the legitimate cries that are coming from our African-American fellow citizens.” There were no calls for censorship of black lives matter or any political position they favor. There were no congressional hearings on the effect of anti-white speech inciting violence against white people. No one is saying we have to listen to the legitimate cries of white people.
On June 14, 2017, in Alexandria, Virginia, James Thomas Hodgkinson Shot Congressman Steve Scalise and also shot Matt Mika, Crystal Griner, and Zack Barth. Hodgkinson was a Democrat who was, according the Virginia Attorney General “fueled by rage against Republican legislators”. There were no calls for censorship of Democrats or any political position they favor. There were no congressional hearings on the effect of speech inciting violence against Republicans or conservatives.
Why is only pro-white advocacy being singled out for censorship?
Right-wing speech is routinely blocked
at universities due to threats of violence from leftist thugs. The threat of violence ALWAYS comes from the left. Universities are engaging in political censorship at taxpayer expense in violation of their tax-deductible status. They are censoring YOUR constituents. They are making it harder for YOU to get elected. Why don’t you hold a hearing on university censorship?
Tyranny is free speech with exceptions.
In Communist countries the word “fascist” is used all the time. In fascist countries almost all opposition was called “Communist.” That is exactly the way “racist” is used today.
Freedom of speech is always suppressed with the excuse that it might cause trouble. Tyrannies like Nazism and Communism always used somebody else’s totalitarianism to justify their own.
In fact, no suppression of free speech has EVER used anything but screaming some label to justify itself.
If no one stands up for the right of a person to openly talk about the disappearance of the white race we see going on around us, how long will it be before Political Correctness condemns the discussion of other issues?
Stalin’s Constitution of 1936 declared more freedom than did any US constitution, state or Federal. But those announced freedoms were limited by one small problem: No one could exercise them if they would interfere with Purposes of the State.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote The Gulag Archipelago about his nightmare years in Soviet Death Camps. He was sent to the Gulag for writing private letters that were critical of Stalin. It was one of tens of millions of cases where Soviet Freedom of Speech had an exception.
We are told that “Hate is not free speech.” Throughout history, the motto has been that “Heresy is not free speech.”
By that definition, everybody has free speech. Slaves were permitted to say anything they wished, so long as it did not interfere with the will of their masters.
As with Stalin, the so-called “right” to free speech is now simply the right to speak if it doesn’t cause trouble.
Every established religion and tyranny in history had free speech according to those criteria. The Medieval Church, slaveholders and Mao-Tse Tung all agreed that they allowed free speech, with certain exceptions:
1) Heresy was not free speech;
2) Free speech was all right if it didn’t make trouble; or
3) Stand in the way of the purposes of society.
Those three exceptions are all accepted by America today, by the left and by the respectable right.
“If all printers were determined not to print anything till they were sure it would offend nobody, there would be very little printed.” ~ Benjamin Franklin
Calling disagreement “hate” is childish.
Truth doesn’t cause violence, censorship causes violence.
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” ~John F Kennedy
“We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.” ~John F Kennedy
There is currently a global genocide of the white race.
Genocide is defined under UN Resolution 260 as any attempt to eliminate a group by any means. Every white country is being flooded and force assimilated BY LAW with millions and millions of non-whites. This is genocide by force blending. The conditions of interbreeding are forced. Genocide need not be violent or involve killing. Sterilization and force blending are two methods of genocide which do not necessarily involve killing. Pertinent parts of the international law against genocide:
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
a) Killing members of the group:
b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Article III
The following acts shall be punishable:
a) Genocide;
b) Conspiracy to commit genocide;
c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
d) Attempt to commit genocide;
e) Complicity in genocide.
Force blending meets the definition of genocide under Article II (c).
The United States Senate ratified the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide on February 19, 1986. Enabling legislation to enforce this treaty has also been voted into law, namely 18 U.S.C. § 1091 signed into law by President Ronald Reagan as the Genocide Convention Implementation Act of 1987 on November 4, 1988. Pertinent parts:
18 U.S. Code § 1091 – Genocide
(a)Basic Offense.—Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1) kills members of that group;
(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;
Force blending meets the definition of genocide under section (a)(4) of 18 U.S. Code § 1091.
The United States not only has an obligation not to engage in the crime of genocide, it is obligated to take steps to prevent genocide.
You can’t be a separatist and a supremacist. You can’t supremacize people who are NOT THERE.
Self-determination is not supremacy.
If race doesn’t exist, what’s diversity?
If there’s no such thing as white people, what’s white supremacy or white privilege?
We see that every excuse given for singling out pro-white advocacy for censorship is spurious. Whites, in fact, are under attack globally. They are being subjected to harassment, censorship and violent assaults. They are the only group being denied the basic rights to homelands and self-determination. They have every right to speak out against their genocide.
Racial politics is the inevitable result of multiracialism. Anyone for multiracialism is necessarily in favor of racial politics.
Anything governments REQUIRE you to believe is a lie. Anything governments REQUIRE you to disbelieve must be true.
Perhaps you think your white voters will remain in a demoralized, self-hating state forever. Perhaps you believe you will never be hauled before an international tribunal for support of white genocide. Perhaps you believe you can continue to dog whistle to your constituents then stab them in the back the moment you take office and they will nevertheless continue to vote for you. But what if you’re wrong?
George Orwell explained in his novel 1984 that a rational society must include the right to say that two plus two equals four. It must include the right to say what is true.
In 1799, the Federalist Party passed the Alien and Sedition acts which largely outlawed any criticism of government policy, even if the criticism was true. In 1800, the people voted them out and soon the Federalist Party ceased to exist. The PEOPLE, not the courts, got rid of that whorish doctrine, “The truth is no defense” in America.
Sincerely,
The Team at Fight White Genocide
About Fight White Genocide:
We’re human rights activists calling attention to the crime of genocide being committed against the white race. The crime of genocide was codified under international law by General Assembly Resolution 260 (adopted Dec 9, 1948 in effect Jan 12, 1951), The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
This genocide is being carried out by means of mass non-white immigration and forced assimilation in ALL and ONLY white countries the goal of which is to force blend ONLY white people out of existence. Anyone who objects to this crime is subject to harassment, intimidation, violent acts and threats of violence, psychological terrorism, job loss, and prison terms.
We DEMAND an open and free discussion of white genocide without threats of attack from screamers, thugs, or thought police.
We DEMAND a worldwide repeal of all laws that make it illegal for white people to speak out for their racial interests.
We are against white supremacy in all its forms, including the notion that white people have a moral obligation to take care of every race but their own.
We unequivocally condemn, denounce and disavow the use of violence to achieve political ends.
Read more at http://www.fightwhitegenocide.com/
Futile, yes. Useful, yes.
When things inevitably decay even more and things become very very heated…can’t say we didn’t warn them.
When a control system that was obsolete before everyone could access the net is still being used by people that could easily find a better control system for people and things on the net in 10 minutes then they are part of the problem of supporting the old outdated obsolete control system . Use key word searches to find the better control rulemaking system and start using it now don’t wait one more minute , start writing rules and voting on others posted rules that
Control things . Quit wasting your valued life time communicating with idiots .
April 9: House Judiciary to Hold Hearing on Strengthening Anti-Whitism & Streamlining White Genocide
“The hearing will also foster ideas about what social media companies can do to stem white nationalist propaganda…”
Can we have a moment of silence for our lately departed Free Speech?
Ok so, private owned bussinesses on the net run by a certain group with an agenda to censor others that don’t agree with their agenda of their bussinesses owners is appaerently ok in the US . So , put up your own site with your private agenda for your group and censor everyone that does not agree with your groups agenda. No problem . Now, what is important to remember is people that are members of the Sen /ho u. are supposed to support free speech ECT. For all amers. ,that is what amer. Stands for ,expressions of different ideas some bad some good , depends on your reasoning. If those members of Sen/ho u. Want laws to censor US cit. s. They are communists or socialists or dictator types that need to be sued by groups that are censored .
I watched the entire hearing except for the last 10 or 15 minutes. Congressman McClintock from California was the ONLY Committee member that defended free speech.
His words were what almost any Congressman would have said a half century ago, but in today’s hearing his words had the dead sound of an epitaph inscribed on the tombstone of free speech.
What I don’t understand is why Whites still don’t have a white identity. https://www.amren.com/news/2019/04/race-in-america-2019/
I understand that the anti-whites are demonizing White identity every chance they get; however, you would think that whites would secretly have one and admit it to the pollsters. Race is in the media every single day. The government, media, Hollywood, and churches keep on bring up race and yet only 15% of whites say it is central to their identity.
We have to tell Whites that “It’s OK to be White!”.
As far as people with White skin having an identity like White RACE people it is difficult because a lot of them are mixed race , But , they also are being genocide as well along with the Almost pure with over 93.75 percent, And. ,Hybrid with over 75 percent Almost pure White RACE genetics White RACE people . White skin people that are mixed have very little cultural history of their own , but , IMO that’s not a bad or good thing it just is. All white skin people must STOP white genocide because they to will become extinct. The Only people that will be left will be people with the color of skin like Obama that is also mixed race and not black race like everyone thought. I want all different races to survive and not be mixed into one race like the Rich people want that control everything on the planet. Could you imagine if all horse breeds were forced into one breed , or all whale s were forced to mix into one whale phenotype . The Rich people that are trying to force everyone to mix into one phenotype race are trying to manipulate and change nature so they can control people better and make more money from them .Its like GMO’s in food . Its not a good thing , if nature wanted to evolve the way the Rich controllers of everything wanted nature would be that way already.
Excellent video on this topic by Lana Lokteff at Red Ice. Lana’s beauty is a reminder of what we’re fighting to preserve.
I am sad to say this, but most of the White people I meet daily are still brainwashed to the extreme. We have a lot of work to do,still,to change the current viewpoint of many of our people. I do think it is starting to change, but we are in the early stages of revolution which requires patience.