Anti-Whites

DOUBLETHINK

• Affirmative action says, in plain English: you can discriminate in favor of Black people, but not against Whites.
  It is impossible to discriminate FOR someone without discriminating AGAINST someone. But this self-contradictory policy is written into US law as a “solution to the racial problem.”
• Anti-Whites are getting desperate. They are repeating all the old cliches, not one of which we haven’t heard a thousand times, and accusing us of repeating ourselves.
  But look at the BASIC here. Behind all the repetition is the simple fact that their silly little non-racial world is not RELEVANT any more and everybody, including them, knows this.
• “I don’t believe there is any master race.”
  You anti-whites certainly believe in a master race when it comes to BLAME:
  “The WHITES did it.”
  Good old Orwellian Doublethink! Whites are responsible for everything but Whites aren’t special.
• Someone who says the White race is responsible for everything is saying that the White race is SUPERIOR.
• Anti-Whites say Whites are responsible for EVERYTHING. Non-Whites are responsible for NOTHING, like animals.
  They are more White supremacist than I am.
• In our Politically Correct society, a forensic pathologist must do two things:
  1) Be able to identify the race of a corpse from a few skinless remains and
  2) Say that race doesn’t exist.
  Good old Orwellian Doublethink!
• Pro-Whites accuse anti-Whites of pushing White Genocide because anti-Whites want to end the White race. Anti-Whites reply:
  1) They should end the White race because the White race is evil.
  2) They don’t want to end the White race.
  3) There is no such thing as the White race.
• Anti-Whites say:
  1) We should quit because everybody is against us.
  2) What we say could lead to a Nazi Regime.
  That is, we have no support and we might take power.
  Why do we argue with these clowns as if they were serious when we just need to quote THEM to show what nitwits they are?
• If someone says White people deserve to be overrun and miscegenated out of existence, one must nail them down on what they just said. They cannot argue that genocide against Whites is not taking place AND that we deserve it as REVENGE.
• Hitler and today’s Jewish opinion are in absolute agreement.
  Jews say that anyone who wants to preserve the White race is anaziwhwantstokillsixmillionjews. They insist that if the White race survives, it is the end of the Jews.
  In order for Jews to survive, they say, the White race must be “assimilated” out of existence.
  In plain English, today’s Politically Correct doctrine is “Jews and Aryans cannot BOTH survive.”
  Which is EXACTLY what HITLER is accused of saying.

DUHH!

• Three things anti-Whites do.
  First, laugh at their own jokes.
  Second, correct spelling.
  Third, pretend to be helpless and say they want to know where facts come from.
• When someone asks what a “White” country is, you tell them it is one of the countries they insist has an obligation to import huge numbers of third world immigrants. THEY define it all the time. Don’t get tied up defining something for them that THEY have defined.
• If you want to know whether a people is White, simply look at whether immigration to those countries is being talked about. It is ridiculous for us to get into definition of something that has already been defined so far down into your parietal lobe that you don’t even notice it.
• The “DUHH!” approach.
  So you’ve never heard anybody talk about a race problem. You’ve never heard the White race condemned.
  You’ve never heard anybody insist on open borders.
  You’ve never heard anybody say the Final Solution to race is “mixing THE races,” when they mean only mixing races in predominantly White countries.
  I am not even sure this comes up to the level of a good solid lie. It is certainly not a reply, and it is less than childish.
  Mommy Professor will let you get away with this crap, but you’re not with Mommy Professor here.
• To White anti-Whites, hating White people is a form of virtuous self-sacrifice.
• Anti-Whites are PROUD to be anti-White.
  You are part of a program to end the existence, SPECIFICALLY, of the White race. That is its PRACTICAL, REAL result. To say that is not anti-White is like saying that those who supported slavery were just objectively pro-property.
• When someone uses this “DUHH!” tactic, NEVER get into the drooling pit with them.
  I have never heard a single person actually take “That depends on what you mean by the word ‘is’” seriously. People just laughed and went on.
  And that is the only way to deal with the “DUHH!” tactic.
  Everybody went through the stage when they were young when they thought that instant amnesia was smart.
• The real curse of mankind is dumb people who think they are smart, hopeless provincials who think they are being sophisticated when they follow a cut-out pattern that Harvard or New York tells them will make them sophisticated, professors who INCURABLY think their bigotry is the only true tolerance.
  And the moral cowards who truly believe they are Courage Incarnate.
• The fatal error is not being silly. It is believing that your silliness is the opposite of silliness:
  1) Nobody is more destructively dumb than the dumb man who thinks he is smart;
  2) No one is more disastrous than the professor who thinks that HIS bigotry is the opposite of real bigotry;
  3) And so forth.
• Genocide is not defined by violence, much less military invasion. If you will read the Genocide Treaty, you will find that genocide is any action that is aimed at ending a race or ethnic group. Most of the methods listed do NOT involve killing anybody.

NO DEFENSE

• You Political Correctness fanatics are playing a very old game.
  When you call people names who disagree with you or scream Hate or racism, a.k.a., HERESY! it says nothing about the point we heretics make.
  But it tells us ALL about YOU.
• When someone says you must not believe that White gentiles have a right to survive as a group because believing that makes you a Nazi and offends people, he is also saying that you must believe it whether it is true or not.
  He is saying you should lie about it.
• Every society has its own word for HERESY! You denounce all heresy to Political Correctness as Racism.
  This is supposed to allow you to refuse to answer me. This is supposed to give you the right to suppress my opinions. But in a free society you can’t hide behind labels.
• The other side only has two defenses,
  1) To ignore Bob’s Mantra: and
  2) To scream HERESY! at us.
  Cut them off at the pass.
• When anti-Whites call us “ignorant” what are they ACTUALLY saying?
  “My Politically Correct Mommy Professor and the media’s carefully selected “respectable” conservatives tell me everything I will ever know. I refuse to learn from anybody else. Everybody outside of Mommy Professor and respectable conservatives is just plain IGNORANT.”

“WHITE GUILT”

• Whites have committed no evils other races would not have done had they had the power.
  ONLY White people ever felt ashamed of slavery or abolished it.
• Whites have committed no UNIQUE evils. We have done many, many unique GOOD things. The device you are using now is one of them.
• There is no such thing as a native people. Every piece of ground where everybody lives was taken from somebody else.

SOCIOPATHS

• When they ask us Whites “Why are you concerned about your people disappearing?”, our response is to try to JUSTIFY our concern about our group’s survival.
  This QUESTION, for any other people, would bring a person under suspicion of genocide.
  Call them on it.
• White self hatred is SICK!!!
• Why should a bird spend most of its one precious lifetime assuring that birds who look like him or her populate the earth long after he or she has ceased to exist? This is how every sociopath reasons. But in my day, this was not the basis of being a sociopath. This was and is the basis of being a CHRISTIAN or a conservative or a libertarian or anything else.
  This is MORALITY!?
• Dante reserved the coldest and worse part of Hell for the outright traitors. He reserved the hottest part of Hell for those who, in a time of crisis, preserved their neutrality.
  Hell or not, that is traditional decency.
  Every sociopath has an excuse for staying out of the action.

ANTI-WHITE TOADIES:

• You have seen what the Mantra can do. They know very well that if Whites look at the situation rationally, as any other race would be expected to do, the anti-Whites are lost.
• “What’s the secret to defeating the enemy?”
  This is personal.
  This is MY country.
  This is MY race.
  You HAVE a country. What right have you to mine?
  This is genocide. How DARE you be a part of the genocide against MY race?
  Anyone like me who does not defend MY race is a traitor.
  Nothing you say should EVER reflect any other attitude.
• If an anti-White says he is loyal to principals, he is saying exactly what the Inquisition said.
  I can then go into the whole concept of wordism. If they are loyal to some words, do they have any idea what monstrosities have been justified in a loyalty to words?
  They can try to talk about why THE White race should survive. You ask them if they would ask a Black man the same question.
  They say blacks have a history of persecution. You ask if the black position is therefore inferior to their ideals.
  You admit that you are not God. You are loyal to your own people just like everybody else is.
• There are TWO rules about lies and liars:
  1) Don’t use the words routinely and
  2) Once you use it on somebody, NEVER let them forget it.
  If you violate rule 2, then YOU are the liar.
• If you’d like to say “You’re damned right I’m a racist!” remember the person calling you racist is mindless. So for you to confess to a mindless accusation makes you mindless too.
• It is true that false statements hurt one’s credibility
  But we also have very little space, and we have to make our points at the sacrifice of credibility
  But I have a weapon. Anyone who critiques me for points not central to my argument dreads the title “nit-picker.” It destroys THEIR credibility. It makes THEM look desperate.
• We are NOT trying to get into a battle of who is the Most Informed. The ONLY question is how silly THEY are.
  The point is that they are loonies. They are silly. They are wrong. The second you become like a “respectable conservative” and treat them as if they were saying something serious, you’ve LOST.
  I don’t play to lose.

WAR

• Anyone who, ACTIVELY OR PASSIVELY, subscribes to immigration and especially assimilation is joining the battle to destroy our race, and it makes no difference whether their motivation comes from the Pope, Karl Marx, or Ayn Rand.
• White majority countries constitute what is called “the race problem.” Solving the race problem is code for solving the WHITE problem. As one New Left leader put it in a burst of honesty: “The White race is the cancer of history.” For once, the Love Generation spoke plain English.
• The Communist Party gained power in Europe largely because the Establishment there gave the working class no other choice.
  If all I have to choose between are those who demand the extermination of my race and the Klan and the Nazis, I’ll choose the latter.
• On campus, violence ALWAYS comes from YOUR side when any pro-White speaks. That is a standard tactic.
  Of course you blame us for what Hitler did THEN, but you refuse to take any responsibility for what your side does NOW.
• When the collapse of Batista came, Cuba went from fascist to Communist, ALL THE WAY. Russia went from Communist to fascist. If things are the way I see them, the safe, moderate position today will put you in enormous danger in the future.
  You may have to EXPLAIN your “anti-racism”.

Integration-Miscegenation

• Every single state that adopted the US Constitution banned interracial marriage.
• Every state that ratified the Bill of Rights had & enforced a law against miscegenation. All but 1 of the states that ratified the 14th Amendment had & enforced anti-miscegenation laws.
  But Federal courts say the Bill Of Rights & #14A were written to outlaw anti-miscegenation laws.
• The Roe V Wade decision struck down all state abortion laws. It is utterly ridiculous to challenge the court’s right to make this decision after accepting the 1968 Supreme Court decision which struck down all state anti-miscegenation laws.
• In 1968, twenty states had anti-miscegenation clauses in their constitutions. But the Supreme Court said that, regardless of the fact that all the states that ratified the Constitution and almost all the states that ratified the fourteenth amendment and had enforced anti-miscegenation laws, the United States Constitution did not allow anti-miscegenation laws.
• In 1967 the Supreme Court invented the right to miscegenate out of whole cloth.
  There was absolutely nothing “lawless” about Roe V Wade if you accept the 1967 anti-miscegenation decision.
  And I have yet to meet one single pro-lifer who EVER criticized it.
• Shaun Hannity said that if he sees a black & blond together all he sees is two Children of Christ.
• I’ve heard it a hundred times: “I was for integration, but the thing has gone too far.”
  And I have said a hundred times, “We TOLD you it would go this far, and you laughed at us.”
• Displacement is an entirely different thing from genocide. In mechanics or in population, displacement means substituting one substance for another. Those who seek genocide prefer mixing to displacement: their object is not to SUBSTITUTE, their object is to DESTROY.
• The same Catholic Church that bitches about Roe V Wade excommunicated people in New Orleans who objected to Brown Versus the Board of Education of Topeka and cheered when all anti-miscegenation laws were struck down by the Court without a shred of precedent. None of this was in a Secret Book. It was headlines.

Immigration

“NATION OF IMMIGRANTS”

• It is insane to have a law which forces a random sampling of humanity to be on one side of a border while another random sample is kept within that boundary.
• Militiamen go out with guns to enforce immigration laws but they denounce the “racism” which is the only reason for there to be immigration laws in the first place.
• Every social animal protects its borders. But we cannot protect our borders because there is no we. A random selection of hispanics in the border patrol keeps out a random selection of hispanics on the other side. We do not have what every other social animal has had for a hundred million years: a gene pool to be protected.
• The Constitution did NOT set up a “nation of immigrants.” Just the opposite. Like everything else, they expected the people of the United States to decide on immigration on the basis of whether those immigrants will be good for US and OUR posterity. Nobody has the slightest claim on the United States but our own citizens.
• Prometheus: Would Blacks vote for Obama if it would mean the entire country would be run by Blacks? ME: Yes. Then when America turned into New Orleans, Blacks would try desperately to move to Europe. Mexicans will pour into America, Mexicanize it, and then they will try to escape this new Mexico. Whites escape Blacks, then get subsidized housing to make the neighborhood diverse, then escape again.

“HISPANIC-AMERICANS”

• The media says that Republicans lost California when they tried to stop giving welfare benefits to illegal aliens. This assumes that Hispanics born in the US are more loyal to their fellow Hispanics who are illegals than they are to American citizens. The vote shows that is true.Everybody knows that any politician who tries to do anything about illegal aliens will lose if he has Hispanic voters. The media agree that California Republicans cut their own throats politically when they tried to keep Americans from paying for benefits to known illegal aliens.
  

  ---

  Hispanic voters who call themselves Americans have no loyalty at all to Americans. Their only loyalty is to other Hispanics.

• One is not allowed to say that American Hispanics have no loyalty to other US citizens, but only to other Hispanics.
  But that’s how they vote.
  That’s how they march.
• A Mexican asked me on Fox whether I was saying that Hispanic immigrants had no right to a country, meaning OURS. I replied, “Immigrants HAVE a country, or they wouldn’t be IMMIGRANTS.”
• People are always talking about the American southwest is going to become Hispanic and go into the sewers with the lands they came from.
  We need, as Paul Harvey says, to tell the REST of the story.
  When wetbacks have turned the land across the Rio Grande into a copy of what is south of the Rio Grande now, what will happen?
  Obviously, the wetbacks will come across the Mississippi to get out of the world they created.
  This is WHITE flight, not British flight or Southwest flight. Until the British learn to continue the story beyond Britain, until Americans learn to pursue the story beyond illegal immigration, the story will not be told.

ILLEGAL ALIENS

• No alien has any rights under the United States Constitution. It applies only to ourselves. Legally resident aliens have only those rights expressly granted them. They are NOT covered under the Bill of Rights. Before they have ANY rights, Congress must pass an act stating them specifically. Illegal aliens have no right to due process.
• The true Preamble, “We the people of the United States and OUR posterity,” can be the basis of dealing with ANY issue:
  “What’s in it for US?” No alien has any rights under the United States Constitution. It applies only to ourselves. Legally resident aliens have only those rights expressly granted them. They are NOT covered under the Bill of Rights.
• If you have to build a wall to keep someone IN, you’re doing something wrong. If you have to build a wall to keep people OUT, you’re doing something RIGHT.

CRIMINAL ANTI-WHITE ESTABLISHMENT

• Liberals and cuckservatives have often confused prisons with their ideal of a normal society. They routinely say that the US Border Patrol that keeps Mexicans out of the US is the same thing as the Berlin Wall, which kept East Germans from escaping their country’s dictatorship.
• Federal troops were used to enforce integration when Arkansas and Mississippi tried to resist it.
  But no respectable conservative will ever mention that today. Many cities refuse to enforce laws against illegal immigration. In fact, many cities have declared themselves to be havens for illegals. If the president was constitutionally required to send troops to the South, why are there no Federal troops in those cities?
  This is ammunition to use on the firing line, not a purely philosophical question.
• You have no right to foist dumb people on my descendants, people who will be naked and need clothing and hungry people who will need feeding. You feed them and clothe them by making them genetically capable of doing that for themselves. #GeneticMorality
• “Joe Shmoe who is 25, fresh off the boat. He is poor and has little money, but is an honest and honorable man. He finds himself a small job. Not much, but it is income. Sometimes the job market is shaky where he has to find new employment.”
  You left out the critical point:
  He gets off the boat into a land established by people who are fundamentally different from the ones who made up the country he left.
  Libertarians are never smart enough to note that basic reality. They say Joe did it ALL himself.
  An America inhabited by Mexicans will be a Mexico.
• Libertarians believe in magic. They say there is this magical border between the US and Mexico. When a Mexican crosses it, his labor’s value quintuples.
  Here is where the magic comes in: There is no COST to this benefit. That doesn’t happen in the real world.
  I am always suspicious of any benefit which has no cost. And here is the cost: the reason that invisible border is magic is because the land ABOVE the border is populated by a people that is far, far more productive than the ones below it. It isn’t MAGIC after all!
• Conservatives talk about paying for more soldiers for foreign adventures, but our own borders are completely unprotected. Illegal immigrants pour in. According to the Constitution, the purpose of the United States is to provide for “OURSELVES and OUR Posterity.” The first purpose of our armed forces is to protect OUR borders.
• Conservatives talk about paying for more soldiers for foreign adventures, but our own borders are completely unprotected. Illegal immigrants pour in. The first purpose of our armed forces is to protect OUR borders.
  We spend a lot more to defend Israel’s borders than we do to protect our own. And conservatives want more troops to protect other people’s borders. Until OUR borders are defended, no more troops should be provided for our politicians to play with abroad.

ANTI-WHITES/REPLIES TO:

• The minute Eastern Europe got rid of the Communists, they began to be asked, “Are you ready for immigrants yet?” If Vietnam or China had just thrown out the Communists, it would never OCCUR to anybody to ask, “Are you ready for immigrants yet?”
  

  ---

  When a black country gains its independence, nobody asks, “Are you ready for immigrants yet?” But for Russia and Eastern Europe, it is taken for granted that, since they are WHITE countries, massive third world immigration is the next step.

• Japan is facing a population implosion. But the pressure is not on for Japan to open its borders to immigration. Within months of the collapse of the Soviet Empire the media were asking “Is Eastern Europe ready for immigration YET?”
  The reason for this is so obvious we never even noticed it: Eastern Europe is WHITE, and EVERY White country and ALL White countries are supposed to be bringing in the third world.
• There were about a million Indians occupying 3 million square miles of ground when the Whites came. It produced a sobbing and a guilt complex that is running casinos today. But those same types say that Eastern Europe is “underpopulated” so the third world has a right to pour in.

Race

AWWS (ANTI-WHITE WHITE SUPREMACISTS)

• Every discourse by Mommy Professor blames the comparatively awful state of non-Whites on what Whites did to them. It never even OCCURS to anybody that non-Whites can be blamed for doing anything wrong, because our history is based on the concept we all accept that it does not matter what non-Whites do.
• “I don’t believe there is any master race.”
  You anti-Whites certainly believe in a master race when it comes to BLAME:
  “The WHITES did it.”
• Good old Orwellian Doublethink! Whites are responsible for everything but Whites aren’t special.
• Someone who says the White race is responsible for everything is saying that the White race is SUPERIOR.
• Anti-Whites say Whites are responsible for EVERYTHING. Non-Whites are responsible for NOTHING, like animals.
  They are more white supremacist than I am.
• Everybody assumes White moral superiority. The very idea that any other race would worry about OUR survival is assumed, by everybody, to be a joke. The very idea that we would ignore a threat to any other race’s existence is unthinkable.
• Whites are supposed to “rise above” any consideration of their own kind. Whites are expected to be purely objective, and non-Whites are NEVER expected to get up to that level.
  This is stupid of Whites, but such an attitude would be impossible to accept so easily if everybody, white and non-white, took it for granted that whites, and whites alone, are MORALLY superior.
• Whites are supposed to “rise above” any consideration of their own kind. Whites are expected to be purely objective, and non-Whites are NEVER expected to get up to that level. Everybody, White and non-White, takes it for granted that Whites, and Whites alone, are MORALLY superior.
• Historians whine endlessly about how “the white man’s diseases” made Indians SUFFER. But my ancestors suffered from those diseases a LOT more and a lot longer than Indians did.
  But that’s not SUFFERING. White gentiles can’t SUFFER like minorities do.
  Like HUMANS do.
• There are blacks who wake up in the middle of the night worrying that somebody somewhere is using the N word and that a lot of whites don’t want them to marry their daughters.
  Those people need help, but it isn’t political help they need.
  Maybe Prozac and a nice rest home would do them good.
• Black men seem to wake up in sweat having nightmares about white men who do not want their daughters to marry them. This is a diseased attitude and a thoroughly white supremacist outlook.

REALITY

• “Culture” makes little difference in politics. Race makes ALL the difference in politics. The earlier, whiter Cubans who came to America are solid Republican. The darker ones (the ones who came later) have, to use the standard euphemism, “returned to more traditional Hispanic voting patterns.”
  Translation: They’re colored, so they’re anti-White.
  Some things are so obvious it’s hard to talk about them.
• Find me an American Indian who wants to live like an Indian and I’ll find you a diamond that weighs a ton.
  Find me an African who wants to be just like an 1800 African and I’ll hand you Bigfoot.
  But at the top of the list, find me an Asian who wants to live like the average Asian when their Great Civilization was the top of the world and I”ll give you Mars on a paper plate.
  Get serious!
• For endless ages, Oriental Wise Men have sat around saying things like, “Meditate upon The Clapping of a Single Hand.” I would answer this with a bit of Occidental Wisdom: “By definition, a single hand doesn’t clap.”
  Most Oriental Wisdom can be described this way: “It sounds obscure, but it is actually meaningless.”
• Indians would come here to study when Indian per capita income was $70 and people were dropping dead in the streets. And they had two topics of conversation: one is how superior India is as a civilization, and the other topic is how they can keep from having to go back.
• What if you woke up after being in a coma and looked out the window? Assume further that when you looked out the window all the people you saw were dark-skinned.
  You would assume it was a poor, crime-ridden, dirty place.
  Anti-Whites spend their entire time trying to say this is an accident.
• Brown-skinned countries are stagnant. Putting it that bluntly upsets the “scientific racists” every bit as much as it does the anti-racist. They want to prove it is true by EXPLAINING it.
  I just go back to the fact that it is true. I go back to the fact that the anti-racists are betting the entire future of the human race on the idea that this is an accident.
  I say that is bad. I say that is evil
• According to Mommy Professor, skin color means nothing.
  Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, going by Occam’s Law, Skin color is EVERYTHING.
  You know the standard of living and average income of any country simply by knowing what color its people are.
  On Planet Earth, you know how safe a neighborhood is by the color of its inhabitants.
• Here on earth, where do the non-Whites go?
  To White-SKINNED countries.
  Not to IQ countries.
  Not to Culturally Aware countries.
  Not to religiously correct countries.
  On the real planet earth, the wetbacks are ALWAYS swimming towards WHITE SKIN.

ECONOMY

• You point at economic ideas while America is turning brown. It doesn’t matter what economic or political theory a brown country says it believes in, it will be a tyranny and it will live in poverty the minute there are not enough White countries & White people to pull it out.
• The most accurate economic indicator of the wealth of nations is the color of the skin. All ancient civilizations that went down and STAYED down are now brown-skinned. You can wake up in a country after a drunk, take a look at the skin color around you, and tell me what the country’s standard of living is.
• Only Communism was able to keep white countries in poverty while the rest of the white world was thriving.
  But White countries are recovering from Communism. Brown skin is FOREVER.
• This is the way economics works in the real world:
  1) White or Mongoloid countries that use — in the latter case, copy — the free market all get rich fast.
  2) Brown countries are poor.
  3) Communist countries of every color are poor.
  That’s not very complicated is it?

HISTORY

CIVILIZATION:

• Why should all the unstoppable invasions in history stop at Vienna?
  Ghengis Khan, Islam, Communism, each has rolled over and united everybody who fell under the general definition “mankind.” Then they slammed into the West.
  We are NOT “mankind.” We are brawling, aggressive people no one can unite.
  Or conquer.
• Two thousand years ago Tactitus praised the Germanic tribes and said the Middle East was where all perversion came from. He was dead right.
• There are many runic inscriptions on stone in Northern Europe, but historians agree that that is the only writing that was done in Northern Europe. If you THOUGHT about it, it would seem a little strange that people could write highly complex statements on rock but nowhere else. Where did they LEARN to write? There are no Primers etched in Northern European stones.
• Every literate person should know by now “Arabic numerals” came to Arabia from Aryan, Indo-European India. But I was watching a documentary on Islam recently in which they once again said that the Arabs came up with our present numbering system.
• Just before India began its slide into sub-third world status, the Brahman became the top caste. India’s Aryan conquerors devoted themselves to Wisdom, became brown and collapsed into a starving mess with only little brown Wise Men to show for it.
• Zoroastrians were, in their great days, an Aryans-only faith, and Iran means Aryan.
  In its later, DEGENERATE form, Zoroastrian became a rejection of all life, not a form of racial pride. That is from where the doctrine of spaying and neutering became a part of Christianity.
• Every discussion of Great Civilization factors in every bit of information but one: Everywhere a Great Civilization fell and STAYED down, the people of that former Great Civilization are now BROWN.
• The only facts that would make my writings seriously wrong would be if someone actually showed me an Ancient Civilization whose people collapsed PERMANENTLY and who didn’t turn into brown people, or how the world was anxious to get rid of any other race than ours.

ENVIRONMENTALISM:

• You know those temples that are found in the middle of the Central American jungles? It turned out that the Indians built up civilizations there and destroyed the trees and brought on droughts and flooding that brought down each civilization. The jungle, with its thin, Amazon-like soil, then grew over it.
• White settlers of the Shenandoah Valley found it already cleared. In order to get herding animals to hunt there, the Indians burned it off every year.
  The standard portrait of the native Americans as benign ecologists is somewhat marred by this practice. One forester observed that had this seasonal burning continued, in a few centuries Virginia would have become either a PRAIRIE or a desert.
• For example the mammoths and all the other big animals in America died just after the Indians came over here on the land bridge. But every documentary busts a gut trying to prove that this was a COINCIDENCE. There were at least twenty earlier Ice Ages when the Bering Strait became solid land, but those animals didn’t die out until the Indians used it.
• There were at least twenty earlier Ice Ages when the Bering Strait became solid land, but the mammoths and other big animals didn’t die out until just after the Indians used it. Every documentary busts a gut trying to prove that this was a COINCIDENCE.
• The BBC, PBS and the entire Politically Correct establishment keeps trying to explain that every large species in America, from the mammoth to the Giant Sloth, just HAPPENED to drop dead at the same time Nature-Loving Native Americans came across the land bridge from Asia.
• Before the White man brought the horse to America, more Indians were killed by buffalos than buffalos were killed by Indians. Once Indians got horses, they started slaughtering buffalo, cutting off only the hump for meat. You know, that thing that only the Evil White Man did.
• It is not the first world but the third world that destroys its native life forms and dumps pollution into the air. It is Brazil that is destroying its jungles, aka, rain forests. Brazil, a brown country with an exploding population, can’t afford not to.
  Progress does not destroy nature. Stagnation does.
• When a scientist says something that the authorities WANT to be true, it is NEVER true.

SCIENCE:

• The most amazing thing about Aryan society requires a roll of drums. We are the first and only society in history where the following can happen:
  Someone produces statistical proof that magic works and ghosts are all about us. It is unlikely, but let’s say it happens.
  Does our society, based on science, then collapse?
  No. We say, “Damn! I would never have imagined such a thing could happen.”
  Then we factor in the fact that magic works and ghosts exist and go on with our lives.
  Before Western Science, every society had a complete explanation for everything. So they asked no further questions and they went nowhere.
• Modern science is absolutely and entirely the product of Western Civilization. Every other so-called Great Civilization stopped at the slave and rowboat stage of technology.
• You live in the first society in history which made any distinction between science and religion.
  You live in the first society in history where experiment can destroy authority.
  Historically the only way for truth to progress was for one people following the wrong authorities to be destroyed.
• The Practical Man in 1800 could have given you an endless number of reasons why the idea of sending pictures through the air with electricity would be an absurd idea, all based on his careful reading of The Latest News From Science.
  First of all, he’d say, you would need several billion leyden jars, even the new improved ones.

GOLDEN RULE

• If I were in Satan’s camp, I would encourage people to limit the Golden Rule to THIS generation.
  Nobody would want to be born in a brown-skinned country today. But everybody says that’s OK for future generations.
  That’s as good a violation of the Golden Rule as any cruelty you can imagine, and it lasts MUCH longer.
  What I have just said is the substance of the teaching of every church on earth except Identity Christians.
• Do unto others as you would have them do unto you is the ONLY Commandment Jesus declared. Nothing could violate that more than making a brown world. Nothing could violate that more than preventing the birth of healthy white children to desperate white parents for the sake of some fertilized eggs that feel nothing.
• Animals & other races do not question if life is worth living.
  Aryans do.
  So we keep producing religions that degenerate into genetic suicide.
  Can a race which reaches the level where it questions the animal urge to survive itself survive?
  That is the question we are deciding today.
  If we lose, what we call “mankind” is doomed to being a huge anthill of rising and falling slave pits called Great Civilizations. And what we call the “human race” will go out like the Permian Extinction and the dinosaurs after it.
• Baywatch was instantly the most popular show ON EARTH. It was about as Nordic as a show can get, but somehow the countries liberals say are multiracial and lost in admiration of racial mixing glued their eyes on the screen and couldn’t get them off.
  In the real world all the PC theories are just plain silly.
• After two thousand years of ignoring and violating genetic reality, Western Civilization is about to run into it head-on.

Free Speech

“HATE SPEECH”

• When does free speech become Hate speech? From the word “Go”. All MEANINGFUL free speech is somebody’s Hate Speech.
• Freedom of speech does not include HERESY.
  Each society has its own word for heresy.
  In Communist countries, all dissent was called fascism. In Fascist Italy, all dissent was labeled Communist. In a Politically Correct world, all dissent is called racist or Hate.
  If we would just point that out, we wouldn’t have to make endless defensive demands for freedom of speech.
• Each society has its own word for HERESY! In Communist countries all opposition was crushed as “fascism”. In Fascist Italy all opposition was crushed as “Communist”.
  In our Politically Correct society, all opposition is denounced as HATE!
  HATE! is not the same thing as real hatred. Look at the “anti-racist” sites and you will see snarling hatred in its rawest form.
• Liberal freedom of speech means freedom of speech for liberals.
• Someone who uses the word “Hate!” is himself a hater, just as a person who believes that anyone he disagrees with is a “Liar!” is just demonstrating that he is himself a routine liar.
  “Hate” is a big word to a decent person. Anyone who uses it routinely is motivated by hate.
• I normally have no right to force you to do anything unless what you are doing might harm me. That’s the first rule of freedom. But if I hate myself, I cannot apply this rule. Self-hatred is a mental illness which makes it impossible for people to deal with each other rationally.
• “Heritage not hate” accepts the proposition that preserving the White race is hate.

REAL FREEDOM

• Everybody says;
  “Freedom of speech means you can say anything you want to SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT DO HARM OR OFFEND SOMEBODY.”
  And only Ole Bob will tell you how ridiculous it is for an adult to say something as silly as that.
  Freedom is the right to offend or harm others.
• Free speech is not the right to say anything that doesn’t offend anybody. Every slave in the Old South had the right to say anything he wanted to so long as it didn’t offend anybody.
• According to modern Free Speech doctrine, you are allowed to say anything you want to, but you can’t say something that might offend somebody.
  There is a word for the person who can tell you you are not allowed to have an opinion that offends him. He is called your master.
• My individual point of view tells me what I want. I NEVER try to justify survival or freedom. Words are a means for me to obtain what I want. The minute you let someone use words to TELL you what you want, you become a slave.
• When you dig through all the agony of George Orwell’s novel 1984, you get to the point where the inquisitor is forcing the main character to agree, under torture, that two plus two is whatever he wants it to be. The poor tortured protagonists is screaming, “Please, just tell me what it SHOULD be!”
  The essence of freedom, says Orwell, is to say that two plus two equals four.
• People love to say “I oppose extremism”. No one but me seems to notice that that is a tautology. By definition “extremism” is a position that, IN MY OPINION, is too far out to be considered. Everybody opposes views that, IN THEIR OPINION, are extremist. That is why they call them extremist views.
• Those who demand suppression of free speech in America say, “Freedom of speech is to be used, not abused. There is no room in America for racism.”
  They then quote the famous line, “Freedom of speech does not include the right to shout ‘FIRE!’ in a crowded theater.”
  I have a question:
  What if there IS a fire in a crowded theater?
• If someone says you should not believe something because it makes you a Nazi, he is not saying it is the truth. In fact, the minute someone says you should not say something because of its IMPLICATIONS, he is telling you he is perfectly willing to lie about it.
  For the public good, of course.
  For your own good, of course.
  But the bottom line is that he is justifying a lie.
  Truth is not what you want to believe. And truth is not something that offends no one.
• In a police state, people like you genuinely cannot understand anything that contradicts orthodoxy. Good Communists in Communist states believed they had freedom of speech, because one could say anything one SHOULD be allowed to say.
  You are convinced that one is allowed to say anything one SHOULD say, so you cannot understand anything that is outside of those bounds. You retreat behind “You don’t make sense.”
  That is routine for the totalitarian mindset.
  I do NOT respect the totalitarian mindset, especially when it is incapable of realizing what it is.

TYRANNY/CRIMINAL ANTI-WHITE ESTABLISHMENT

• The Diversity myth is so ridiculous that anti-Whites cannot allow that myth to be DISCUSSED freely anywhere on earth. Debate diversity inside the US and you lost your career. Discuss it outside the US and you go to prison.
  Repeat the above paragraph in any respectable publication and you are in deep, deep, trouble.
  (The mistake made on Stormfront is a discussion of evolution or revolution as if it were OUR choice.) Pushing the race question to a matter of prison leads to revolution. But that is not because it is OUR choice. It is because the Diversity Myth is so ridiculous it can only be imposed by unremitting force.
• Whether there will be evolution or a revolution is historically up to those who are in power. Any establishment which cannot adjust rationally ends up being overthrown at a huge cost to those who make it up. Our PC establishment CANNOT be reasonable about race. The Diversity myth is so ridiculous that anti-Whites cannot allow that myth to be DISCUSSED freely anywhere on earth.
• Pushing the race question to a matter of prison leads to revolution. But that is not because it is OUR choice. Our PC establishment CANNOT be reasonable about race. This is because the Diversity Myth is so ridiculous it can only be imposed by unremitting force.
• Nothing could be STUPIDER on the part of the Politically Correct Terror than openly imprisoning people like David Irving, openly, for the CRIME of HERESY.
  David Irving and others who are in prison under the Politically Correct Terror are doing a job that they know very well is the death knell of the Politically Correct Terror.
  I regret the pain ANY martyr has to face. But it absolutely indispensable, and I am sure Irving KNOWS that.
• America is the only country in the world, including Ireland, where you do not throw people in prison for disagreement. Ireland uses the British precedent: in cases of inciting racial violence, “the truth is no defence,” (The Crown vs. Joseph Pierce, 1987). But that’s not YOUR fault, though Hitler is OUR fault, right?
• Nobody notices this but me.
  One of the sure signs of an authoritarian state is the silencing of criticism.
  Two rules:
  1) Every authoritarian state always begins by silencing all criticism of its doctrine, and
  2) No authoritarian state ever says it is silencing criticism just to be mean. It ALWAYS gives a Reason.
  Nationalist governments pass some kind of Patriot Act. The very name of that Act comes straight out of George Orwell. Anyone who criticizes the government is declared to be attacking National Unity.
• Presently the situation is exactly like one in which someone says to you, “We live in a world of Dungeons and Dragons. If you deny that you will be arrested or lose your job or both. What is your proposal for this world of Dungeons and Dragons?”
• So the Modern Inquisition excuses its oppression by saying it only suppresses discussion that offends people.
  The end of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” ought to be different.
  The kid said, “He doesn’t have any clothes on.”
  “The people said, ‘We can all see that. When is the Emperor going to raise our taxes and order an even BETTER set of clothes that don’t exist?’”
• In the Old Inquisition when a person was burned alive for heresy their family had to pay the expenses.
  No, I am NOT joking.
  If a banned book is sent to someone in Canada and burned, the person it is sent to must pay for the cost of burning it.
  No, I am NOT joking.
• You can join the mob and scream about “censorship” when prayers are banned in school and the fact is trumpeted nation-wide. This is what I call “famous censorship.”
  Famous censorship is not real censorship. The whole point of real censorship is to keep things from becoming famous.
  Let me repeat: real censorship is what you DON’T hear about.
• The thugs, as we all know, determine who speaks on every campus. If someone they don’t approve is scheduled, they threaten to riot and the faculty always backs down “to avoid trouble.”
• Anti-White power is certainly not based on anything you have to SAY. It is based ENTIRELY on the universal authority and power of the PhDs and public officials and now the respectable conservatives and the European police who have been ranged, without allowing a single break in the solid front, on the anti side.
• Open suppression of discussion would not be necessary if whatever group it is had absolute control over all aspects of our thought. White males had the kind of power in the 1920s that no one could imagine ever failing. But one generation of cowardly morons destroyed all that.
• Freedom of speech and assembly were guaranteed in the 1936 Soviet Constitution, which STALIN wrote.

Wordism

REAL NATION

• In order to allow other nations to exist, you have to be a nationalist yourself. The instant you go beyond your national self-interest in actions abroad, you begin being an imperialist.
• America could allow freedom for different propositions to compete precisely because it was based on a natural identity of whites.
  1) a nation based on race has to keep other races out;
  2) a country unified only by principles or Ideals or Wordism has to keep other IDEAS out.
  You simply cannot have free speech in a country whose only unifying force is “dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.”
• Wordism is a diversity of races and only one single “multiculture.” Even its racial diversity itself has to be uniform in a propositional or Wordist state.
  A race-based state offers every kind of real variety.
• Those who want lawyers, bureaucrats and academics to rule are the opposite of nationalists. Nationalists believe that men are united by a common heritage and by blood ties, not by words and documents. Lawyers, bureaucrats and academics believe that the only thing that makes one a citizen of a country is words. A person who believes that men should be united according to their nation — their common race and culture — is a nationalist. One who believes that men are only united by words should therefore be called a “wordist.”

“PROPOSITION NATION”

• The 5 Words and Emma Lazarus:
  A liberal, and therefore a respectable conservative, will say he supports America, but ONLY so long as America exists for 1) the 5 Words “All men are created equal”, & 2) immigration, and lives up to the words of Emma Lazarus on the Statue of Liberty.
• There has never been a stable multiracial democracy and never will be.
  A multiethnic state must be a propositional state, that is, based on words rather than on natural identity. Such a state cannot allow freedom of speech. If the only unity is based on a proposition, then it cannot allow anyone to say anything that challenges the proposition.
• There has never been and will never be a multi-racial democracy. Already the judiciary is taking over the reins of an electorate that cannot elect responsible officials. Soon votes won’t matter at all.
  “Civil rights” and every other critical non-fiscal issue is decided in the courts, not in the White House or in Congress. All that is LEFT to vote on is looks. All that is LEFT to report on is verbal screwups.
• The Constitution specifically outlaws judge made law. The first word of Article I of the United States Constitution is “ALL.”
  The US Constitution says “ALL legislative powers are vested in the congress”.
  But today all legislative power is going to the courts by default. In a multicultural, multiracial country law cannot be made by common consent. In such a society there is, BY DEFINITION, no common consent.

  ---

  In a system as weighted down with checks and balances and separation of powers like ours, which was developed for a monoracial, monocultural country, nothing but a dictatorship can function. The only dictators who can function freely are the courts.

• One thing everybody agrees on today is that America is a Principle. As National Review says, America is a Propositional State. According to the flagship of respectable conservatism, you and I, whose families have been in this country for hundreds of years, have nothing to do with The Real Meaning of America.
  Thailand may be the Thais, Japan is the Japanese, but America has nothing to do with the people who happen to inhabit it. America is based on a Proposition, a Set of Ideas. A Patriot is one who is loyal to those Ideas.
  In other words, National Review agrees with liberals that you can be loyal to America without having any loyalty at all to the American people. Respectable conservatives feel Americans should be grateful because they do not actually HATE Americans the way liberals do.
• One thing everybody agrees on today is that America is a Principle. As National Review says, America is a Propositional State. In other words, National Review agrees with liberals that you can be loyal to America without having any loyalty at all to the American people.
• When you define patriotism as a set of words, a proposition, a BELIEF, you also define TREASON as having the wrong ideas and being loyal to the wrong proposition. No matter whether the Wordism is “all men are created equal” or Marxism or Catholicism or Islam or Protestantism, you simply cannot allow anyone to say things that might damage the proposition which is the only foundation your country has.

HERESY

• There is no one more cruel than someone who thinks he is torturing people to Save Their Souls. He cannot tolerate simple mercy, because he is dedicated to True Mercy.
• Wordism is the opposite of nationalism. A Wordist believes that people can be united only if they believe the right thing, if they accept the right words as the Only True Faith. A Communist, a fanatical Catholic, a fanatical Protestant or a Politically Correct person is a Wordist.
• There is never a real truce between universalists. A nationalist or a racist is perfectly willing to let other races and nations have their space. But no universalist can ever honestly concede the right of any other belief any room at all on Planet Earth.
  That, after all, is exactly why he calls himself a universalist.
• There are thousands of Universal Truths, every one of which says, “If you follow MY book, that is to say, my opinion of my particular book, I will unite all of mankind.” There is nothing more divisive than wordism. Universalism is always divisive. And vicious.
• A person who says his entire world view is based on the Word of God is saying that he IS God, in exactly the same way that a judge who says he is “interpreting” the Constitution is saying that he IS the Constitution.
  If you “interpret” the Constitution, you ARE the Constitution. If you interpret God, you ARE God.
• 50 or 100 thousand years ago some caveman shaman made a wonderful discovery. Instead of speaking for himself, he said he spoke for God. He found that people who would not listen to him would listen to God.
  And he discovered that, if you are God’s spokesman, it is just as good as BEING God.
• Marxists and Libertarians say the same thing. Only the Book unites them. Every shred of feeling and conscience has to lie between the covers of a book.
  So who cares which Book it is?
• In a Wordist world, we are trained to code all our natural loyalties into books. We do not say, “I demand the right to do what I wish, even if you think it is bad.” We have to get a thick book to show that doing what we want to do is, to use Ayn Rand’s word, Objective.
• Ayn Rand called her philosophy, which is doing what YOU want to do, Objectivism. You can’t follow your subjective preferences without someone telling you how objective they are.
  The fact that nobody but me laughs at this shows how mired we are in Wordism.
• Every religion says it is Eternal Truth,and, as secular opinion changes, every one of them suddenly discovers that their version of Eternal Truth was incorrect because they have just read something else into the ancient texts that conforms with Modern Opinion.
• Wordism can NEVER be consistent. It has no BASICS. It flows along in a river of words and experts and tens of millions of words of commentary. As in today’s “Christianity” everything changes but that is all words, so they simply make up new words to make the changes look unchangeable. Orwell’s 1984 simply exposes nakedly what our wordists do all the time.
• You do not ask a person with a healthy mind to justify his own existence.
  Aleksander Solzhenitsyn, in discussing his own survival in the Gulag, keeps putting these words into italics: ”an individual point of view”.
  Solzhenitsyn is a Russian because he is a Russian. He keeps emphasizing how those who had to JUSTIFY their feelings of loyalty and decency could not stand up to a Marxist state.
• The second you start justifying yourself to a Wordist, you become weak. No matter how strongly you feel about your particular faith in your particular set of words, the Wordist is now judge and jury.

HATE LAWS

• It is not entirely accidental that Hate Laws are jailing people all over the world for questioning the proposition on which Politically Correct society is based. Such infringements ALWAYS expand unless the root cause, propositional unity, is removed.
• As a freeborn American, I do not believe ANYTHING that ANY government requires me to believe.
  That is one of the basic principles my country was founded on.
  That is one of the basic reasons we came here in the first place.
• There are two sides:
  1) One group wants to get out the FACTS about the Holocaust;
  2) The other side wants to put anybody who discusses the Holocaust in prison.
  Then there’s me.
  I want to know why 2) is doing something so insane.
  THAT is what makes 2) nervous.
  It is not SANE to put people in prison for disagreeing with history, right or wrong.
  1) argues they are right. That is the argument that does NOT embarrass the Modern Inquisitors.
  My position on the Holocaust is that of a free-born American:
  Anything that a government requires you to believe is an out-and-out lie.

“TRIBALISM”

• America is the “land of opportunity.”-?? Land is soil. You can do a chemical analysis on the soil of the US and you will not find any scientific evidence that American soil contains more opportunity than any other soil. America is the PEOPLE of opportunity.
• People say they are loyal to America and America is a melting pot. By definition, a melting pot is nothing specific. Anyone who can be deeply loyal to nothing specific needs psychiatric care.
• “Racism” says different peoples should occupy different lands. This means that there is a place on Earth for other races. Wordism says there is no place on Earth for any other form of wordism, racism, nationalism. There is only room for one universal wordism to unite all mankind.
• Universalists say that if everybody believed what they believe, human conflict would cease. Meanwhile in the world I live in, millions of people are slaughtered by one universalist faith like Communism because they adhere to another universalist faith like Christianity.
• It is estimated that 1/4 of the population of Germany died in the 30 Years War. If you represent the Only True Faith, you cannot tolerate the very existence of other opinions. Finally, the True Faiths lost power, the nation-states took over Europe, and the slaughter ended.
• My own pro-White views are a simple matter of “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” No human being should be born into a world without Whites.
  Identity Christians seem to want to read the White race into the history of Ancient Israel.
  I do not need the Old Testament to justify my devotion to my race.
  I don’t care whether Abraham was an Aryan or not. The survival of my race is not something that I need to justify.
  I have never been able to substitute Scripture for my conscience. That’s called blasphemy in the culture I was raised in, though no one uses that word any more.
  The Bible is a guide, but it is NEVER an excuse.
  At least, that’s what religious dinosaurs like me were raised to believe.
• Christianity was originally brought to us in the form of the Gospel, which fit in perfectly with our concept of truth.
  But as soon as they had sold Christianity to us, they dragged the whole Old Testament with them on a very big boat — you couldn’t carry all those scrolls on a small one, and started to impose the old Temple Priesthood on us.
• In my youth, before Roe V Wade, there was an unspoken alliance between the Catholic Church and the political left. Liberals and the Catholic Church were in absolute agreement that what was in your genes was superficial. What you believed at the moment was all that mattered.
• Once they hear it people use “Wordism” as anything they hate. That is NOT what it means. Wordism is loyalty to one’s own version of a book, and nothing else. Decades before 9/11, I was warning people that evangelicals were temporary allies on some issues, NOT COMRADES. Now they fight for Israel and interracial adoption.
  I told you so!
  But there is no room for someone who thinks that water runs uphill or socialism or diversity works.
• If you want to know about someone, let them talk. When a person justifies honesty by quoting a Book, you had better put your wallet in a safe place.
  His Book can change tomorrow. His INTERPRETATION of his Book can change tomorrow.
  Honesty is what an honest man takes for granted.
  Wordism is for psychopaths.

CULTS

• Wordist institutions are vampires. Like other vampires the only life an institution has is what it can take from people. Loyalties that nature intended to be used for the perpetuation of a people are used for the institution.
• The United Nations is the enemy of nations.
  Diversity is the enemy of diversity.
  The National Education Association is the enemy of education.
  Modern opinion and progressive thought are hopelessly outdated.
  There is nothing as provincial as a universal institution.
  Capitalized words are always the cover they use for going wildly in the opposite direction.
• The Melting Pot has always been the ideal of every kind of Wordism. This is OLD. Alexander the Great sought to unite his empire by intermarrying easterners and westerners. Lately the Reverend Moon conducted massive interracial marriages.
  The Reverend Moon used to be on TV regularly performing a thousand marriages at a time.
  Did you ever wonder why those mass weddings were regularly shown briefly, there was never a single CLOSEUP of any of the partners?
  Because they were almost all interracial. It was, after all, the Universalist Church.
  All cults, all Wordist institutions have this as an ideal. They want to have a new generation whose ONLY common bond is THEIR MEMBERSHIP IN THE CULT.
  The Reverend Moon demands interracial marriages. He wants people to be united only by the Reverend Moon, the Second Christ, not by blood.
• The Wordist denies all ties of blood. His greatest enemy is race. All cults want to have a new generation whose ONLY common bond is THEIR MEMBERSHIP IN THE CULT. The Reverend Moon demands interracial marriages. He wants people to be united only by the Reverend Moon, not by blood.
• Any form of Wordism is going to bring new members into the tribe just because they can recite its creed. They come in as temporary allies but they stay as citizens. Wordism eats the volk.
• Every institution becomes wordist, that is, it becomes based more and more, not on reality, but on its own words. As an institution evolves and becomes stronger, its own survival takes the place of its original purpose. To bitch about that makes as much sense as groaning about the fact that evolution forces us to use the outhouse.